Loosening Up in Street Photography

I’m a bit of a maximizer (as opposed to a satisficer) when it comes to choosing/doing things.

I try to find out all there is to know before making a decision.

When it comes to execution, I try to go through the various steps in my mind in order to get everything right beforehand.

IMG_20150105_0001 640

Which is why zone focusing and street photography is such a re-creation for me.

IMG_20150105_0002 640

We’re working with a circumference of acceptability.

Is good enough good enough? There’s motion blur here which adds to the sense of movement.

IMG_20150105_0003 640

I was close enough, but it doesn’t mean I could see clearly.

And if we don’t always notice everything around us, why should we demand a photography that sees everything accurately and in sharp focus?

IMG_20150105_0004 640

On the other hand, how much loosening up can one do before one loses discipline?

IMG_20150105_0005 640

There’s a spectrum here, between trying to get everything clinically right and hence losing the moment and operating without some sort of discipline, as if one is holding a camera for the first time.

IMG_20150105_0006 640

Sometimes, good enough is good enough in street photography.

IMG_20150105_0007 640

Try to get everything right and one might lose the “street”.

IMG_20150105_0008 640

There’s that tendency to overthink and hence lose the art.

IMG_20150105_0009 640

On the other hand, one must possess discipline in order to lose it.

IMG_20150105_0010 640

So my job is to learn everything I can, and then forget all I have learnt.

IMG_20150105_0012 640

Imperfection is an art in itself.

IMG_20150105_0015 640

And so is perfection.

And perhaps art is about improvising and about knowing how to move back and forth between perfection and imperfection.

Thanks for reading.

 

 

Camera: Leica M6

Lens: Summicron 50mm Type II

Film: Ilford XP 2

 

 

 

Singapore as Comfortable Grid

I’ve been reading Alexander Nehamas’ Only a Promise of Happiness and some of his words jumped out at me:

Beauty always remains a bit of a mystery, forever a step beyond anything I can say about it, more like something calling me without showing exactly what it is calling me to. Since no words are enough to convince me that something is beautiful (or its opposite), it is a call I can only hear on my own, beyond what anyone can say to show that making it part of my life might be worthwhile. (pg. 78)

_MG_0215 640

We’re in the end looking at and listening to that innermost voice calling out to us … I suppose that’s a good description for anyone who knows what it means to be an artist, poet and/or street photographer.

_MG_0212 640

Again, from Nehamas:

Even the narrowest judgment of beauty has far-reaching consequences and makes a difference to one’s mode of life. What such a life will bring is impossible to predict and, once it has brought it, difficult to evaluate. You can’t know in advance the sort of person it will make you and you can’t ever be sure of the worth of the person you have become. You can’t even be certain that you will eventually consider what you find through the pursuit of beauty to have been worth your while. (pg. 129)

_MG_0228 640

I suppose all we could do is wait and see and hope to grow into the sort of person we’d want to be…

_MG_0632 640

Sometimes it is tempting to fall into that path of least resistance, choosing a course of action simply because it is there and it is a well-worn path.

Go into a shop, buy a thing, any thing.

_MG_0634 640

And sometimes it is after exhausting a particular option that one begins to want more…

_MG_0646 640

What does it mean to flourish?

_MG_0649 640

How may one begin to understand how one path leads to another?

_MG_0654 640

Are we caught in a web of our own making?

_MG_0694 640

Is there room to maneuver?

_MG_0794 640

Or perhaps the grid is comfortable, after all.

_MG_0795 640

A sort of ready-made architecture of success beckons.

_MG_0807 640

We see.

_MG_0808 640

We try to make sense out of this.

_MG_0810 640

We look into ourselves and hope we find something significant…

 

 

Open-edition prints available here.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Artistic Process: On Being in the Zone

Street photography can get addictive.

Sometimes it’s the challenge, because you’re setting yourself up to be unobtrusive.

IMG_20140320_0021 640

My cameras are all very small. My Minolta AF C and Olympus XA 2 look like plastic toys so people don’t take me seriously even when they spot me.

Sometimes you want to be spotted. It adds drama to the scene.

IMG_20140320_0071 640

Sometimes you’re right in their faces but they can’t be bothered … this man saw me with my camera pointing at him and went on doing what he was doing…

IMG_20140320_0041 640

I get out and walk and get “in the zone”. It’s a subjective (but common enough) experience.

For me, it happens when I’m writing or reading or when I’m teaching, when I’m fully immersed in the experience without any sense of self-consciousness.

In “Tradition and the Individual Talent”, one of my favourite essays on writing poetry, T. S. Eliot wrote (among other things) on the artistic process:

What happens is a continual surrender of himself as he is at the moment to something which is more valuable. The progress of an artist is a continual self-sacrifice, a continual extinction of personality.

And he goes on to say:

Poetry is not a turning loose of emotion, but an escape from emotion; it is not the expression of personality, but an escape from personality. But, of course, only those who have personality and emotions know what it means to want to escape from these things.

Writing, reading, teaching, and street photography are ways of getting myself outside of myself. It’s a way to silence that inner voice at the back of my head so that I’m not second guessing and talking to myself all the time.

IMG_20140320_0023 640

 

IMG_20140320_0067 640

Anyone who wants to be good at what he or she does (especially though not necessarily in the field of the arts) ought to read Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience and Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention by Mihály Csíkszentmihályi.

He uses the word “flow” to describe that happy state of being engaged in endeavours such as artistic creation, athletics, scientific tinkering, and so on, to map out relationships between learning, enjoyment and satisfaction.

It’s rather “pop psychology”-ish, but it’s very enabling in terms of helping me think about art creation in a wholesome way, in a way that is opposite to that image of the tortured artist celebrated by the media. Van Gogh, Diane Arbus and Sylvia Plath – the list goes on.

But surely there’s also room for artists/writers who want to be productive and remain sane… there’s Henri Cartier-Bresson, who deliberately moved away from photography to take up painting later in his life, there’s Wallace Stevens, poet and vice-president of an insurance company, who was productive as a poet all the way till his death in his seventies.

IMG_20140320_0050 640

 

IMG_20140320_0074 640

I get out of myself and look at other people and think about what it is that occupies them…

This man, for instance, stood just like this for a really long time, looking at a building across the road.

I took some time to frame the scene properly, and turned around later and saw there were bemused people looking at me looking at him…

IMG_20140320_0125 640

Everywhere we go, we bring along a baggage of impulses, desires, anxieties, ambitions…

IMG_20140320_0092 640

Maybe one day I’ll get caught and someone would tell me to grow up and that this is not a proper use of my time…

IMG_20140320_0091 640